communications
interpretations
definitions
representations
repercussions
expressions
conversations


 

re:constructions  


Communications

CHINA
Compiled by Qi Wang, 09/16/2001

Author's Note: Though this section offers a glimpse at Chinese alternative views on the 9/11 tragedy, please understand that the common Chinese sentiment is empathy and sympathy with the innocent people killed or hurt in this sad event.

Background
[Source: http://www.creaders.net/, 9/13/2001]

Late on 11 September 2001, the Ministry of Propaganda of CCP issued an urgent order to news and media agencies nationwide that coverage of terrorist attacks on America on September 11 should be guided in the correct direction, i.e. low-profile and sensible reports on the event, as few as possible detailed descriptions of the terrorist act, basic tone being criticizing the terrorist act while airing no "autonomous" critiques. All critiques should follow the official model set by Xinhua News Agency. However, official control encounters a hard time when it comes to the fourth media: the Internet. While open forums on official media sites like the People's Daily, China Youth Daily, and Eastnet are quick to follow the government's directions and started to delete or ban counter voices, alternative views on the event are still legion in other Internet teahouses.

A Few Alternative Perspectives

  1. On U.S.'s Threat of War Against Afghanistan
    [Source: http://www.dzzk.net/ (Readers' Weekly, vol.103, "Sixty Years Between Pearl Harbor and 9/11 Tragedy"]
    • "We all know and have quoted the famous saying: War is the continuation of politics...The increasing perfection of American domestic regime over the past years isn't necessarily joined by an accompanying self-progress in its foreign policies. It is still a through-and-through imperialist country when viewed from outside. Like the Lenin regime, the US needs war to maintain its economic prosperity, and this is its Achilles' point as well as its lifeline. It needs to create an imaginary enemy in times of peace or chase out its potential enemies for a living."

  2. On U.S.'s Threat of War
    [Source: http://www.cmilitary.com/, 09/14/2001, "Great Threat to China if U.S. invades Afghanistan"]
    • "Before sufficient investigation bares the truth behind the tragedy, the Americans almost too readily jumped to the conclusion that it was done by Muslims in Middle East. Though one could try to understand that its judgment is driven by previous impressions, the situation isn't so simple as it appears. Indeed the US has undergone grave damages in terms of people and property from this attack, and incited national sentiment of war-loving Americans would understandably endorse a promise of retaliation on the attackers. However, before situations surrounding the event are all clear and while investigations are still on the stage of following extensive leads, it demands more than an emotional pretext for the US, a country that always claims to be the preeminent law state and that demands indubitable evidence in every matter, to take such haste in labeling a certain person or country to be the perpetrator of such horrendous crime...It was reported that Bin Laden has long since stopped contacting with the outside world through telephone for security reasons, which means those terrorists might be from other sources. Yet the Americans declared in an almost indisputable tone that Bin Laden is behind all this, and this quick gesture seems quite suspicious in itself. My opinion is that the U.S. government is taking advantage of this event and the American people's fiery sentiment caused by this and uses it as an excuse to conquer Afghanistan, a super important strategic place in the Middle East...If the U.S. ever took hold of Afghanistan (or not necessarily military occupation; a US-friendly government would work as well), Middle East areas would be all under its control with: Russia to the north, China to the east, Pakistan and India to the south, and Iran and Iraq (two "rogue" nations that have long been a huge pain in the ass for the U.S.) to the west. Not to mention precious strategic resources like petroleum and natural gas that the Middle East is most rich in.

  3. "American Democracy is Americans' Governance in the World"
    [Source: http://www.creaders.org/forums/politics/, 09/13/2001]
    • "Ever since World War II the morbid fear and hatred of Arabs has always been a guideline of American foreign policy. Its most relentless insults are mostly directed to Arabian countries. Syria, Sudan, Libya and Iraq are called "rogue nations." For 30 years Israel has committed crimes against the Geneva Convention and illegally invaded and occupied Arabian land while organizing terrorist attacks and assassinations, yet the UN's attempts of sanctions on Israel have all been vetoed by the US.
    • "In the American collective consciousness, Iraq suffers the most vehement hatred and is on the receiving end of vile wishes of the most durable and cruel punishment. Americans once practiced the same hatred and punishment on the native Americans: they were first demonized as barbaric people and then exterminated with only a few to be chased away into reservation lands and concentration camps. This almost religious kind of hatred should not exist in international politics, yet it is the guideline of the U.S.'s conduct around the world. The punishment that the US brings to its enemy is always of doomsday scale and style. In the Vietnam War a US military suggested bombing Vietnam back to the Stone Age, and the U.S. acted under the same dire principle in the Gulf War.
    • "Though the U.S. president keeps talking about the threat of biological weapons in Iraq, one should not forget a fact: the U.S. possesses all the terror weapons that human beings have ever known. The U.S. is the only country that has used nuclear weapons against civilians. Seven years ago the U.S. dumped bombs weighting 6.6 tons in Iraq. It is also reported that the U.S. and Israel are considering using a neutron bomb against Baghdad. The U.S. has never experienced world war on its own land; that is why the majority of its citizens, after being brainwashed, can afford to talk about doomsday-scale extermination with such an easy tone.
    • "Punishing Iraq has become U.S. 'internal policy'...The Persian Gulf has become the ideal locale for the U.S. to test out its new weapons, show off its military muscle, and make U.S. president appear indeed "president-like" in the world. American media are very pleased to offer its consumers an opportunity of flourishing self-righteousness and let them feel good about fighting against the demon figure of a foreign dictator. Media no longer provide sober analysis or alternative views but actually become the mouthpiece of government. The war against Iraq continues in media.
    • "The devastating tragedy that American people are suffering now is actually caused by their short-sighted, narrow-minded, selfish governing elite."

Back to communications



search

resources
education
contact